In a recent segment on “The Tonight Show,” Grant Stinchfield delved into what he perceives as a war on freedom orchestrated by global entities like the World Economic Forum under the guise of addressing climate change. Here’s the full story.
Ecoside Is Worse Than Genocide
The focal point of Stinchfield’s critique is a claim by an environmental activist, whom he dismissed as a “lunatic.”
The activist suggested that while crimes like genocide involve specific intent, ecoside, or environmental harm, is a consequence of businesses seeking profit through activities like farming and fishing.
Stinchfield shared the perceived absurdity of equating farming practices with heinous crimes like murder and genocide, labeling those promoting such ideas as “evil villains” aiming to influence public behavior.
Evil Villains
Stinchfield said, “She was talking about genocide and murder is not as bad as ecoside, you know, like farming and stuff. That’s literally where she is. Fitting is worse than murder. When I talk about evil villains, this is exactly what they are. They want you eating bugs.
The argument extended to the belief that controlling the food supply is a strategic move by these alleged manipulators. Stinchfield contends that if they can control what people eat, they can control the populace.
War on Meat
He highlighted the notion of a “war on meat and more,” attributing it to claims that animal agriculture significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
Stinchfield accused the agriculture industry of spreading disinformation and said, “So what are we seeing happening in the United States? The agriculture industry is spreading disinformation, but here’s where it gets particularly tricky. Not about climate change. They’re spreading disinformation about the public health benefits of a plant for diet.”
The Climate Crisis
The discussion steered toward the broader context of the climate crisis narrative.
Stinchfield suggested that financial interests, rather than genuine environmental concerns, are at play. He pointed to the Chinese Communist Party as a major beneficiary, supplying essential materials for green technologies like electric cars, batteries, and solar panels. Stinchfield questioned China’s commitment to the environment, saying that their primary motivation is profit rather than ecological preservation.
Chinese Premier Li Qiang’s remarks at the World Economic Forum became a focal point, where he shared the need for cooperation on green development to tackle climate change.
They Only Care About Making Money
Stinchfield questions the sincerity of China’s commitment, suggesting that their actions speak louder than their words.
“China supplies the batteries you put in your electric cars. They supply the rare earth minerals that make up those batteries. The windmills are made in China, all of it. They don’t care about the environment. They only care about making money,” Stinchfield concluded.
So what are your thoughts? How can people discern between genuine environmental concerns and alleged agendas driven by financial interests, and what role should the media play in providing unbiased information on these matters?
