During a recent House Transportation Committee hearing, sparks flew between Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg over the topic of electric vehicles (EVs). Perry questioned the effectiveness and sustainability of the current government policies promoting EV adoption, arguing that the market is not responding as expected despite substantial federal support.
Initial Gratitude
Rep. Perry began by acknowledging Secretary Buttigieg’s visit to south-central Pennsylvania, specifically noting the bipartisan support for the ongoing construction project on the South Bridge across the Susquehanna River. This cordial start quickly shifted as Perry pivoted to his main concern: the EV market.
Critique of the EV Market
Perry painted a grim picture of the EV market, describing it as being in a “tailspin.” He cited various statistics to support his claim that the EV sector is struggling despite heavy government subsidies. According to Perry, 98% of cars on the road and 97% of annual car purchases are still traditionally powered. He argued that even with a 7% share of new car sales being EVs, most of these sales are for used vehicles, and the cost of EVs continues to rise.
Consumer Sentiment
Perry referenced reports from McKinsey & Company and Consumer Reports, which suggest a significant portion of EV owners are likely to return to traditional fuel vehicles and that EVs are associated with 79% more problems than conventional vehicles. He also highlighted JD Power’s findings on declining customer satisfaction with EVs, particularly with Level 2 charging, where roughly 20% of attempts end in failure.
Dealer Concerns
The congressman mentioned that 3,500 car dealers had sent a letter to the administration, pleading for an end to EV mandates. He argued that despite the government’s efforts to promote EVs through subsidies and mandates, consumer sentiment is shifting away from EVs. Perry emphasized that the market should be allowed to decide the success of EVs without government intervention.
Buttigieg’s Rebuttal
In response, Secretary Buttigieg addressed what he called the “factually incorrect portions” of Perry’s statements. He pointed out that EV sales are actually increasing year over year. Buttigieg noted that more private citizens are purchasing EVs than government entities, although he promised to provide a detailed breakdown of these figures.
Cost and Sales Trends
Buttigieg challenged Perry’s assertion that EV costs are rising. He stated that EV prices are falling and have reached parity or are even slightly lower than traditional vehicles when subsidies are included. He also clarified that while overall car sales typically drop from Q4 to Q1 due to seasonality, EV sales have consistently increased year over year.
Market Dynamics
Buttigieg argued that the term “tailspin” is inappropriate for a sector that is growing. He stressed that allowing China to dominate the EV market would be economically disadvantageous for the U.S. and that domestic production of EVs is crucial. He reiterated that the administration’s goal is to ensure that EVs are made in America, benefiting the national economy.
No Mandates
The secretary disputed Perry’s claim that there are mandates forcing Americans to buy EVs. He clarified that consumers can still purchase gasoline-powered cars if they prefer, but the government is providing incentives to make EVs more accessible and affordable. Buttigieg emphasized that the administration’s approach is about offering choices rather than imposing mandates.
Concerns About Market Readiness
The exchange between Perry and Buttigieg highlights the ongoing debate over the role of government in promoting technological shifts in the automotive industry. I think Perry’s arguments reflect concerns about market readiness and consumer acceptance of EVs, while Buttigieg’s rebuttals focus on the long-term economic and environmental benefits of supporting EV adoption.
“Why Do They Need to Be Subsidized?”
People in the comments shared their thoughts: “If EVs are so successful, why do they need to be subsidized?”
Another commenter added: “Let’s not forget the endless coal cars heading to the power plants charging the electric cars.”
One person said: “If EV’s actually worked, they wouldn’t need Government subsidies and tax credits for people to buy them.”
Future of EV Policy
As the debate over EV mandates and subsidies continues, it raises important questions about the balance between government intervention and market forces. The discussion also underscores the challenges of transitioning to new technologies in a way that meets both economic and consumer needs.
Consumer Concerns
What are your thoughts? How should the government balance support for new technologies like EVs with allowing the market to decide their success? What are the potential long-term economic impacts of increasing domestic EV production, as emphasized by Buttigieg? How can consumer concerns about EV reliability and charging infrastructure be addressed to improve adoption rates?
Watch the entire video on Forbes Breaking News’ YouTube channel for more information here.
