The electric vehicle (EV) market in the United States is facing significant challenges, particularly regarding affordability. According to Caya from The Hustle, American consumers are paying much more for EVs compared to other countries. This disparity is not just about market dynamics but also involves historical protectionist measures and trade policies that continue to shape the landscape today.

The High Cost of EVs in the U.S.

The High Cost of EVs in the U.S
Image Credit: The Hustle

The most affordable U.S. electric vehicle, once available, has been discontinued, leaving options like the Tesla Model 3, which starts at almost $40,000. Despite various incentives and initiatives to promote carbon neutrality and combat climate change, the U.S. is lagging in EV adoption. This situation contrasts sharply with countries like Mexico and Costa Rica, where consumers have access to a broader range of affordable EVs.

International EV Market Dynamics

International EV Market Dynamics
Image Credit: The Hustle

In Mexico and Costa Rica, affordable EVs abound, with numerous models available for under $20,000. Brands such as Zaka, Zev, Jack Carri, Cayi, Maxus, and Jilzna, which are largely unknown in the U.S., are common in these markets. The main reason these brands aren’t seen in the U.S. is due to trade barriers effectively banning their entry.

Historical Context and Protectionism

Historical Context and Protectionism
Image Credit: The Hustle

Caya says thet the roots of this issue trace back to the 1950s and the dominance of the “Big Three” American car manufacturers: GM, Ford, and Chrysler. The entry of Japanese car manufacturers like Nissan (which initially had to change its name to gain acceptance) and later European brands changed the game by offering reliable, fuel-efficient vehicles. This competition forced American manufacturers to innovate but also led to protectionist measures.

The Impact of the Oil Crisis and Reagan’s Policies

The Impact of the Oil Crisis and Reagans Policies
Image Credit: The Hustle

The 1973 oil crisis highlighted the advantages of fuel-efficient Japanese cars, leading to significant market share gains for these foreign manufacturers. In response, the Reagan administration negotiated export restraints with Japan, encouraging Japanese companies to establish manufacturing plants in the U.S. According to the video, this move was aimed at preserving American jobs but eventually led to automation replacing many of these jobs.

The Current Landscape and Chinese EVs

The Current Landscape and Chinese EVs
Image Credit: The Hustle

Today, American EV manufacturers struggle to produce affordable vehicles, while Chinese companies like BYD dominate the global market. BYD, which started as a battery company, has leveraged its expertise to produce EVs at a fraction of the cost of American competitors like Tesla. For example, the BYD Yuan Plus, a crossover SUV similar to the Tesla Model Y, is sold in China for significantly less due to lower production costs.

Tariffs and Trade Policies

Tariffs and Trade Policies
Image Credit: The Hustle

Caya reveals that the U.S. government has responded to the rise of Chinese EVs with tariffs. During the 2018 trade war, the Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on Chinese-made cars, a measure that continues to receive bipartisan support. A current Senate bill proposes increasing these tariffs to 100%, effectively keeping Chinese EVs out of the U.S. market.

The Consequences of Protectionism

The Consequences of Protectionism
Image Credit: The Hustle

While these tariffs protect American jobs in the short term, they also result in higher prices for consumers and slow the transition to greener transportation options. Countries like Japan are responding to the challenge by innovating and collaborating, as seen with Nissan and Honda teaming up to develop new EV technologies.

“Saving Us From Inexpensive Cars”

Saving Us From Inexpensive Cars
Image Credit: The Hustle

People in the comments shared their thoughts: “The real reason why the USA doesn’t want Chinese EV, will be due to ‘national security reasons’.”

One commenter added, with a pinch of sarcasm: “Our Government is saving us from inexpensive cars.  How noble of them.”

Another person cimply concluded: “If I can not compete you, I ban you.”

A Significant Cost

A Significant Cost
Image Credit: The Hustle

The U.S. government’s approach to handling competition from Chinese EV manufacturers through protectionist policies might safeguard American jobs temporarily but at a significant cost. It stifles competition, keeps consumer prices high, and delays the country’s progress toward reducing carbon emissions. Instead of relying solely on tariffs, the U.S. could benefit from fostering innovation and competitiveness within its auto industry to meet the growing demand for affordable and efficient electric vehicles.

Reconsidering Protectionist Policies

Reconsidering Protectionist Policies
Image Credit: The Hustle

What are your thoughts? Should the U.S. reconsider its protectionist policies to allow more foreign EVs into the market? How can American EV manufacturers innovate to reduce production costs and offer more affordable options? What role should the government play in balancing job protection and consumer interests in the auto industry?

Watch the entire video on The Hustle’s YouTube channel for more information here.