Design camarin1

Published on June 3rd, 2009 | by Susan Kraemer

10

Zero Energy Houses Creating a New Design Vernacular:

The deep Butterfly Roof

The traditional gabled roof that we are all familiar with was engineered to slough off snowfall. But in an uncertain post peak oil future of possible energy shortages and water shortages, more and more houses are showing up with roof-shapes engineered to harvest their own rainwater, and support solar power generation.

This creates a butterfly roof, the opposite of the traditional gable. The very post peak oil Kangaroo House in increasingly drought ridden Australia has the same distinctive roof shape, for the same reasons: it acts as a huge funnel for rainwater, which can then be harvested.
[social_buttons]

This design for a zero energy house on the coast of the Brazilian rainforest features such an inverted gable roof, designed to funnel and centrally harvest its own water supplies for the entire year. This coast of Brazil provides abundant rainfall from January to July.

The huge roof also is also designed to maximize solar energy production on top and to funnel cooling breezes throughout the open plan holiday house, so as to eliminate the need for airconditioning.

Tropical areas such as Hawaii have utilized the Butterfly roof to harvest precious rainwater since the middle of the last century, but these new ones are angled at the steeper 20 to 30 degree angles that are needed to maximise solar production.

With the steeper angle the tropical downpour is also more efficiently harvested in the roof’s center rain-funnel shape, where it is then filtered, stored and pressurized to the tap. The energy generated from solar panels on the roof, and hydraulic, gas and telecom services run in two vertical cores accessible from the bathrooms and kitchens for maintenance. This simple coastal location is far from a public sewage system, so a sceptic tank with a super efficient anaerobic filter cleans up to 90% of the effluent.

The clients of the Camarin Architects wanted a simple holiday house with three bedrooms that allowed wide possibilities of contact with nature. Both the wooden skin that envelops the gallery and the suspended roof, shelter the house from the Sun while keeping it permeable to the cool South wind, to avoid the need for air-conditioning.

Passive cooling is achieved the old fashioned way with wide verandas, and a gallery open to the elements and sea breezes, to shelter the interior spaces from the tropical sun. The wooden skin that wraps the gallery filters the glare, providing intimacy in the bedrooms, shading the interior while framing the views outward.

This design creates its own cool micro-climate during the dry season. The self-sufficiency of the house is unprecedented in the region.

Via Contemporist
Photography by Nic Olshiati

MARIE OSMOND PONDERS THIRD CAREER IN MUSICALS.(LIFE & LEISURE)

Albany Times Union (Albany, NY) February 8, 1994 Byline: DAVID PLOTNIKOFF – Knight-Ridder If she had just played along, if she had just mellowed out and gone with the smiley faced hedonism of the times, things would have worked out differently for Marie Osmond.

She’d probably be the answer to a ’70s schlock-culture trivia question by now — another piece of celebrity fallout from the bell-bottom-and-puka-shell era. But it seems Osmond was always looking one step ahead of the game.

Back when much of teen America was gorging on a bacchanalian diet of recreational drugs and zipless sex, she remained as straight as a stretch of Utah desert highway. Ten years later, when other former teen idols started turning up by the dozens on daytime talk shows to wax pathetic about drug woes and career crashes, Osmond wasn’t around to say, “I told you so.” By then she was already well into a second career as a country singer — just as the country wave was about to break.

Now, Osmond is taking the first exploratory step into what could be her third show-business career in as many decades. Her first attempt at live theater, a new touring production of the venerable Rodgers and Hammerstein musical “The Sound of Music,” has opened in San Francisco. The production, directed by Oscar Hammerstein II’s son James, features Osmond in the Maria role made famous by Julie Andrews and Mary Martin a generation ago. see here marie osmond wedding

During a brief stopover at San Francisco International Airport last week, Osmond talked about her family, her public image and her three decades in show business. At 34, she is a strikingly good-looking, outspoken and eminentlylikable person — a far cry from the saccharine princess she often appeared to be on the small screen.

Osmond and her passel of singing siblings were about two decades ahead of their time when it came to promoting clean-and-sober, family-comes-first values. The squeaky-clean act is no act at all for the Osmonds. And after thousands of interviews, this is one topic that still gets her flapping like a bat out of heck.

“Squeaky clean?” she says, eyes widening as she leans across the boardroom table toward her interrogator. “In general I am what people perceive me to be. But this is what I say when you say ‘squeaky clean': I have worked very hard in my life. I learned a very strong work ethic very young. In the ’70s when everybody was doing drugs and getting drunk and burning out, I believed strongly in taking care of yourself. So now in the ’90s, I guess I would be considered really cool.” Osmond was working at a 200-show-a-year pace on the country circuit, playing amphitheaters and county fairs opening for middle-of-the-road country acts, when the producers of “The Sound of Music” pitched the venture to her last fall. Although the show’s been on the road through five cities in the past eight weeks, Osmond says it’s just now settling into its stride after a shotgun start.

Osmond says the biggest challenge in making the transition from country music to musical theater was adjusting her vocal style. “This is a different way of articulating for me, and I studied with a voice coach to get my diaphragm in shape. The singing style is very different. Rodgers and Hammerstein created a very pure sound.” Osmond is unconcerned about the possibility her work may be measured against previous performances by Martin and Andrews. this web site marie osmond wedding

“When I asked the producers if I should watch the movie again, they said, ‘No, let’s just do it how you feel Maria should be.’ Hopefully, everybody brings their own personality to the role. I’m not Mary Martin or Julie Andrews.” Osmond’s career began at age 3 on Andy Williams’ TV variety show. Full-time stardom came eight years later when her first country recording, “Paper Roses,” went to No. 1 on the Billboard country singles chart.

Millions of people around the world will probably always think of her as the ever-smiling, often dippy teen who ruled Friday night television alongside her equally dippy brother through most of the mid-70s.

“We played everything — every musical style, every imaginable character. It was a lot of 18-hour days six days a week, and some weeks when they’d tape two shows, it’d mean memorizing 700 pages of script. . . . It was very hard to grow up on national television.” Osmond’s four children travel with her most of the time. Her eldest son, 10-year-old Stephen, plays one of the Von Trapp kids in “The Sound of Music.” CAPTION(S):

PHOTO MARIE OSMOND is in a tour production of the musical “The Sound of Music,” which has opened in San Francisco.




MAKE SOLAR WORK FOR YOU!





Next, use your Solar Report to get the best quote!

Tags: ,


About the Author



  • http://www.folkecenter.net Preben Maegaard

    You show examples of Zero Energy Houses. What you show is complete extravagancy and uncessary use of valuable materials. You leave the impression that low energy is costly and not for ordinary people. This is not what the world and the climate needs. The buildings are just for some few rich. Needed is a building code that sets new standards for the ordianry home with its very insufficient insulation, one-sheet window panes, no heat recovery, no solar panels for the summer supply of hot water etc. Be a little more humble. In Austria and Germany you will find thousands of modest homes that are true low energy houses. They call them passive houses because there is no active heating by burning gas, oil and power to heat-up the house.

    Preben Maegaard
    http://www.maegaard.net

  • http://www.folkecenter.net Preben Maegaard

    You show examples of Zero Energy Houses. What you show is complete extravagancy and uncessary use of valuable materials. You leave the impression that low energy is costly and not for ordinary people. This is not what the world and the climate needs. The buildings are just for some few rich. Needed is a building code that sets new standards for the ordianry home with its very insufficient insulation, one-sheet window panes, no heat recovery, no solar panels for the summer supply of hot water etc. Be a little more humble. In Austria and Germany you will find thousands of modest homes that are true low energy houses. They call them passive houses because there is no active heating by burning gas, oil and power to heat-up the house.

    Preben Maegaard
    http://www.maegaard.net

  • http://dotcommodity.blogspot.com Susan Kraemer

    You are right that this one is a very extravagent example.

    I have covered zero energy houses in a variety of price ranges, even how to build your own for $5,000

    I agree that this is not what the world and the climate needs. But design styles do tend to filter down from those rich enough for an “complete extravagancy and uncessary use of valuable materials” – because they hire architects who follow eachothers work. Like how fashion filters down from couture.

    The rich will always be with us. So it is a good thing when they start to engage architects in thinking about sustainability, rather than wet bars or tencar garages or poodle condos which add nothing sustainable to the admired (and hence, copied)design vernacular.

  • http://dotcommodity.blogspot.com Susan Kraemer

    You are right that this one is a very extravagent example.

    I have covered zero energy houses in a variety of price ranges, even how to build your own for $5,000

    I agree that this is not what the world and the climate needs. But design styles do tend to filter down from those rich enough for an “complete extravagancy and uncessary use of valuable materials” – because they hire architects who follow eachothers work. Like how fashion filters down from couture.

    The rich will always be with us. So it is a good thing when they start to engage architects in thinking about sustainability, rather than wet bars or tencar garages or poodle condos which add nothing sustainable to the admired (and hence, copied)design vernacular.

  • Pingback: DrumBeat: June 3, 2009 | EcoSilly()

  • Pingback: Buffalo House to Weather Rainstorms in Kansas : Green Building Elements()

  • Pingback: California Architect Thinks About White Roofs | WordPress()

  • Pingback: A Roof Designed for Our Hotter Future : Green Building Elements()

  • Pingback: Harvesting Rainwater From an Arid Future : Green Building Elements()

  • Pingback: How Obama’s Home Star Program Could Green Up America’s Homes : CleanTechnica()

Back to Top ↑