<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Efficiency Tops with Green Home Owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/</link>
	<description>Reporting on Sustainably Built Environments from Bricks to Cities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:52:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zenga</title>
		<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-5160</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/?p=522#comment-5160</guid>
		<description>The statistics described above is impressive considering the state of the economy. It is great that consumers focus highly on environmentally friendly home construction materials, but agreeably costs have been prohibitive for traditional construction. Today the New York Times reports that buildings in the US account for 39 percent of carbon dioxide emissions, 65 percent of all waste, and 70 percent of all electrical use in the country. Wow! The good news is that great technologically advances construction materials are now available to offset these problems but are being underutilized. These include carbon dioxide containing concrete, eco-friendly wall panels made of wheat and sorghum, and soon new drywall that eliminate carbon dioxide release during its production. While these materials are not as inexpensive as standard materials, combining these with modular home construction which reduces costs of home construction by 20 percent makes for a great solution. Modular homes are more environmentally friendly, lower in cost, higher in value and higher in quality on average. The marriage between these technologies will be able to give homeowners what they want...they can have their cake and eat it too!

Michael Zenga
ZN Custom Building
www.zncustombuilding.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statistics described above is impressive considering the state of the economy. It is great that consumers focus highly on environmentally friendly home construction materials, but agreeably costs have been prohibitive for traditional construction. Today the New York Times reports that buildings in the US account for 39 percent of carbon dioxide emissions, 65 percent of all waste, and 70 percent of all electrical use in the country. Wow! The good news is that great technologically advances construction materials are now available to offset these problems but are being underutilized. These include carbon dioxide containing concrete, eco-friendly wall panels made of wheat and sorghum, and soon new drywall that eliminate carbon dioxide release during its production. While these materials are not as inexpensive as standard materials, combining these with modular home construction which reduces costs of home construction by 20 percent makes for a great solution. Modular homes are more environmentally friendly, lower in cost, higher in value and higher in quality on average. The marriage between these technologies will be able to give homeowners what they want&#8230;they can have their cake and eat it too!</p>
<p>Michael Zenga<br />
ZN Custom Building<br />
<a href="http://www.zncustombuilding.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zncustombuilding.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zenga</title>
		<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-98190</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/?p=522#comment-98190</guid>
		<description>The statistics described above is impressive considering the state of the economy. It is great that consumers focus highly on environmentally friendly home construction materials, but agreeably costs have been prohibitive for traditional construction. Today the New York Times reports that buildings in the US account for 39 percent of carbon dioxide emissions, 65 percent of all waste, and 70 percent of all electrical use in the country. Wow! The good news is that great technologically advances construction materials are now available to offset these problems but are being underutilized. These include carbon dioxide containing concrete, eco-friendly wall panels made of wheat and sorghum, and soon new drywall that eliminate carbon dioxide release during its production. While these materials are not as inexpensive as standard materials, combining these with modular home construction which reduces costs of home construction by 20 percent makes for a great solution. Modular homes are more environmentally friendly, lower in cost, higher in value and higher in quality on average. The marriage between these technologies will be able to give homeowners what they want...they can have their cake and eat it too!

Michael Zenga
ZN Custom Building
www.zncustombuilding.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statistics described above is impressive considering the state of the economy. It is great that consumers focus highly on environmentally friendly home construction materials, but agreeably costs have been prohibitive for traditional construction. Today the New York Times reports that buildings in the US account for 39 percent of carbon dioxide emissions, 65 percent of all waste, and 70 percent of all electrical use in the country. Wow! The good news is that great technologically advances construction materials are now available to offset these problems but are being underutilized. These include carbon dioxide containing concrete, eco-friendly wall panels made of wheat and sorghum, and soon new drywall that eliminate carbon dioxide release during its production. While these materials are not as inexpensive as standard materials, combining these with modular home construction which reduces costs of home construction by 20 percent makes for a great solution. Modular homes are more environmentally friendly, lower in cost, higher in value and higher in quality on average. The marriage between these technologies will be able to give homeowners what they want&#8230;they can have their cake and eat it too!</p>
<p>Michael Zenga<br />
ZN Custom Building<br />
<a href="http://www.zncustombuilding.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zncustombuilding.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Marks</title>
		<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/?p=522#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>It makes sense to me, Dawn. The first thing we have to tackle is improving the technology, and I believe the demand will bring about more affordable and efficient renewable technologies. One place to start is &quot;off the grid&quot;. In the second home market, many popular areas are very rural, often with affordable land where there&#039;s no power, but not all that distant from the attractions. Building lots and parcels are often much cheaper than those in developments with direct access to the grid. Just the savings on the building parcel can more than make up for the cost of using solar or wind power and the sole source of electricity. 
Another place to start would be to start revamping federal buildings with renewable energy sources, and energy efficient fixtures. This would ramp up the competition and mass production of green technologies. At the same time, it would put people back to work who would otherwise collect unemployment. Sure, it would cost the government more money, but we would be getting something in return that would save in the long run, and keep people working with higher paying jobs in the short term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense to me, Dawn. The first thing we have to tackle is improving the technology, and I believe the demand will bring about more affordable and efficient renewable technologies. One place to start is &#8220;off the grid&#8221;. In the second home market, many popular areas are very rural, often with affordable land where there&#8217;s no power, but not all that distant from the attractions. Building lots and parcels are often much cheaper than those in developments with direct access to the grid. Just the savings on the building parcel can more than make up for the cost of using solar or wind power and the sole source of electricity.<br />
Another place to start would be to start revamping federal buildings with renewable energy sources, and energy efficient fixtures. This would ramp up the competition and mass production of green technologies. At the same time, it would put people back to work who would otherwise collect unemployment. Sure, it would cost the government more money, but we would be getting something in return that would save in the long run, and keep people working with higher paying jobs in the short term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Marks</title>
		<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-98189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/?p=522#comment-98189</guid>
		<description>It makes sense to me, Dawn. The first thing we have to tackle is improving the technology, and I believe the demand will bring about more affordable and efficient renewable technologies. One place to start is &quot;off the grid&quot;. In the second home market, many popular areas are very rural, often with affordable land where there&#039;s no power, but not all that distant from the attractions. Building lots and parcels are often much cheaper than those in developments with direct access to the grid. Just the savings on the building parcel can more than make up for the cost of using solar or wind power and the sole source of electricity. 
Another place to start would be to start revamping federal buildings with renewable energy sources, and energy efficient fixtures. This would ramp up the competition and mass production of green technologies. At the same time, it would put people back to work who would otherwise collect unemployment. Sure, it would cost the government more money, but we would be getting something in return that would save in the long run, and keep people working with higher paying jobs in the short term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense to me, Dawn. The first thing we have to tackle is improving the technology, and I believe the demand will bring about more affordable and efficient renewable technologies. One place to start is &#8220;off the grid&#8221;. In the second home market, many popular areas are very rural, often with affordable land where there&#8217;s no power, but not all that distant from the attractions. Building lots and parcels are often much cheaper than those in developments with direct access to the grid. Just the savings on the building parcel can more than make up for the cost of using solar or wind power and the sole source of electricity.<br />
Another place to start would be to start revamping federal buildings with renewable energy sources, and energy efficient fixtures. This would ramp up the competition and mass production of green technologies. At the same time, it would put people back to work who would otherwise collect unemployment. Sure, it would cost the government more money, but we would be getting something in return that would save in the long run, and keep people working with higher paying jobs in the short term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisetrise</title>
		<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-5027</link>
		<dc:creator>lisetrise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/?p=522#comment-5027</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that putting forth the effort to build green now will pay rich dividends every month and for years and years into the future.  

Even energy efficient home design ( see  http://www.building-your-green-home.com/energy-efficient-home-design.html  ) can save a substantial amount of money.  Passive heating and cooling costs little to implement.  Green doesn&#039;t have to mean outrageously expensive.  Yet it is true, as you state, that green homes sell faster and are worth more.   Green building is a wise investment all the way around.  Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that putting forth the effort to build green now will pay rich dividends every month and for years and years into the future.  </p>
<p>Even energy efficient home design ( see  <a href="http://www.building-your-green-home.com/energy-efficient-home-design.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.building-your-green-home.com/energy-efficient-home-design.html</a>  ) can save a substantial amount of money.  Passive heating and cooling costs little to implement.  Green doesn&#8217;t have to mean outrageously expensive.  Yet it is true, as you state, that green homes sell faster and are worth more.   Green building is a wise investment all the way around.  Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisetrise</title>
		<link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/07/11/energy-efficiency-tops-with-green-home-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-98188</link>
		<dc:creator>lisetrise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/?p=522#comment-98188</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that putting forth the effort to build green now will pay rich dividends every month and for years and years into the future.  

Even energy efficient home design ( see  http://www.building-your-green-home.com/energy-efficient-home-design.html  ) can save a substantial amount of money.  Passive heating and cooling costs little to implement.  Green doesn&#039;t have to mean outrageously expensive.  Yet it is true, as you state, that green homes sell faster and are worth more.   Green building is a wise investment all the way around.  Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that putting forth the effort to build green now will pay rich dividends every month and for years and years into the future.  </p>
<p>Even energy efficient home design ( see  <a href="http://www.building-your-green-home.com/energy-efficient-home-design.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.building-your-green-home.com/energy-efficient-home-design.html</a>  ) can save a substantial amount of money.  Passive heating and cooling costs little to implement.  Green doesn&#8217;t have to mean outrageously expensive.  Yet it is true, as you state, that green homes sell faster and are worth more.   Green building is a wise investment all the way around.  Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

