Architecture 2030

The city of the future is not going to be a Jetson-esque collection of bubbles in the air, or towers connected by monorails, or any other radical vision. The city of the future will be more like that in Blade Runner, mostly recognizably familiar older buildings. Most of the city of the future has already been built and is standing. Certainly new buildings will be built. But they need to be made much more efficient than existing buildings. And Architecture 2030 is pressing for architects and the building industry to radically alter their methods of designing and building buildings to address environmental issues.

(The interspersed quotes in this article are taken from the Architecture 2030 "Think You’re Making a Difference?" page.)

Architecture 2030 is a foundation established by architect Ed Mazria in 2002. Mazria famously created the pie chart graph (see illustration) showing that buildings represent 48% of the total energy used in this country. As the largest single segment of energy use, responsible for nearly half of all energy use in the country, buildings need to have more attention paid to them. Architecture 2030 is dedicated to reducing all fossil-fuel, greenhouse-gas-emitting energy use for buildings by 2030, with an immediate 50% reduction (as compared to the typical energy use for particular building types), and phased increases in the reduction percentage until the 100% target is reached in 2030.

Buildings are responsible for more of an impact on the environment than cars or other elements of energy use because they last so long. As you drive around cities in the country, almost all of the vehicles on the road were built within the last 20 years. But the majority of the buildings are at least that old, and many are decades older. Buildings last a long time. They need to be substantial in order to accomplish their purposes. This makes them long-lasting, but they also are slow to adopt new, more efficient technologies. Replacing them is also incredibly expensive and extremely material and energy-intensive. So making sure that our buildings are built efficiently and with an eye to the future is crucial.

For building operations, carbon offsets are one way many people are looking to reduce the impact of their energy use. And while those steps can help to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, the scale of even large scale efforts dwindles to near insignificance when compared to the amount of carbon that building energy use puts into the atmosphere.

"Home Depot is funding the planting of 300,000 trees in cities across the US to help absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions…

The CO2 emissions from only one medium-sized (500 MW) coal-fired power plant, in just 10 days of operation, will negate this entire effort."

Conservation steps can be helpful. Cutting your lighting energy usage by switching from incandescents to compact fluorescents is a step that many sources strongly advocate. (I’ve even mentioned it once or twice myself.) The energy savings are dramatic, and can cut energy use by more than half. Multiplied across millions of households, this amounts to a huge energy total, but lighting is just a portion of total building energy use.

"If every household in the US changed a 60-watt incandescent light bulb to a compact fluorescent…

The CO2 emissions from just two medium-sized coal-fired power plants each year would negate this entire effort."

Lighting energy reduction is a good first step, but there needs to be more done to build on these improvements. In addition to having all buildings be built to neutral GHG-emissions standards by 2030, they are also calling for an equal amount of existing building area to be renovated to matching levels of efficiency. Many steps are being taken presently to increase the efficiency of existing homes and buildings, but often, these steps are just doing less-bad than they are turning things around to the point of doing good. These are positive steps, certainly. But we need to continue to press for further improvements still.

"Wal-Mart is investing a half billion dollars to reduce the energy consumption and CO2 emissions of their existing buildings by 20% over the next seven years. If every Wal-Mart Supercenter met this target…

The CO2 emissions from only one medium-sized coal-fired power plant, in just one month of operation each year, would negate this entire effort."

Even if all of Architecture 2030′s goals are met, there will still be billions of square feet of buildings that have not been renovated by 2030 that will still be needing fossil-fueled energy supplies for their operation. Joshua Hill’s recent article noted the latest imperative from Architecture 2030 which calls for the elimination of coal as the "silver bullet" necessary to stop global warming. In 20 years, it is possible to begin to make significant changes in our energy infrastructure, so that renewable power sources represent an increasing portion of the energy being generated. Those developments, combined with increasing the energy efficiency of the buildings we are building, can help turn our energy profile to one that does not put such a carbon burden on the environment.

Image source: Architecture 2030

Out of Africa.(Walt Disney World’s Animal Kingdom Lodge)

Interior Design June 1, 2001 Disney’s Animal Kingdom Lodge captures the romance and spirit of Africa in a celebration of architecture, animals, and culture.

ONE HAS TO LOOK hard to find any trace of Mickey Mouse & Co. in the design of Disney’s 1,293-room Animal Kingdom Lodge at Florida’s Walt Disney World. The subtle references to Disney’s famous icon are relegated to mere cameo appearances. Clearly, Africa is the star of Disney’s newest resort, which opened in April.

Located along the park’s western edge on a savannah grazed by hoof-stock herbivores, this exotic lodge is the latest answer to Disney Chairman Michael Eisner’s mandate to create architecture that is never boring. Denver-based Urban Design Group builds on the tradition of work done for Disney by other noted architects such as Robert A.M. Stern, Arata Isozaki, Michael Graves, Arquitectonica, Gwathmey Siegel & Associates, David Rockwell, Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo, and its own design for the Wilderness Lodge to invent spaces that invite a suspension of belief. The “Africa” that lies over the threshold of the main lobby is neither cartoon nor caricature, but an innovative reconstruction of Africa’s art, culture, and way of life.

Like everything Disney does, it is the effortless aspect of fantasy the public sees. As guests glimpse the thatched roof of the main building, it is doubtful they will notice that it is made of geo-plastics. Nor will most visitors be aware that the exterior columns–inspired by the look of an east African lodge–are cement and steel manipulated to look like wood. The, palpable reality of the vines that overgrow the building, the sheltering palm trees, the savannah-like landscape and the more than 200 mammals and three dozen species of birds on the site blurs what is man-made and what is natural into a believable whole. animalkingdomlodgenow.net animal kingdom lodge

Both Urban Design Group interior designer Avery Brooks & Associates (ABA), Las Vegas, and lounge/restaurant designer Jeffery Beers International, New York, recognized the need to balance this large-scale “architecture of emotion,” as Urban’s Peter Dominick describes it, with a sense of intimacy. While guests may appreciate the availability of nearly 1,300 rooms when trying to make reservations, they do not want the institutional feel of a mega-hotel.

Multi-level architecture and the basic horseshoe shape of the building subdivide the 900,000-sq.-ft. hotel into a “village” of individual spaces. Bridges and small atriums truncate the corridors. Dominick used these bridges in the public spaces as opportunities to bring light into the building and afford views of the animals from various vantage points. The small atriums built into the guest room floor corridors serve as showcases for African art, tools, and costumes. Changes in levels and an emphasis on strategic focal points encourage guests to explore.

ABA and Jeffery Beers faced the dual challenge of reducing these open spaces to a more human scale without having the furnishings dwarfed by their surroundings. “The proportions of the lobby furniture were carefully studied in model form,” says Todd-Avery Lenahan, principal with ABA. “We designed a shelter-style sofa with a high back for the lobby. Not only do they create a sense of privacy, they also give the proper sense of scale. The hand-carved wood in the sofa frame adds distinction and a sense of balance to the grand scale of the lobby, while the proportions of the cushions and pillows allow for comfort and a human dimension. The lobby’s console tables are higher than usual for better viewing of the artifacts.” For the restaurants, Jeffery Beers mixed large and small statements. Huts and low walls corral the seating arrangements in the 280-seat family restaurant, Boma. Gone is the long line synonymous with buffet service. In its stead is an assemblage of eclectic huts and houses with a mix of colored euki wood, thatch, and other traditional African materials that make this seem more like a marketplace than restaurant.

Jiko, the specialty restaurant, is “a surrealist dream of Africa,” says Beers. Ovens morph into giant vessels while a flock a stylized birds take flight overhead. Abstracted African grasses frame the wine display. The use of tiger wood, hand-carved furnishings, and wooden flooring that brings the guest back to earth and secures a thematic link with the rest of the hotel.

Concern for authenticity was a major theme for Walt Disney Imagineering (WDI) as well as the architect and designers, says Wing Chao, WDI executive vice president of master planning, architecture, and design. After traveling through Africa, WDI and the design team settled on a tighter interpretation of the safari theme. Zulu shields, African butterfly masks, handwoven Kente costumes, and art influences from the Ivory Coast, Mali, Upper Volta, Nigeria, Sudan, and Kenya combine to give guests the experience of being in an Africa few will ever see firsthand. site animal kingdom lodge

Maintaining authenticity was particularly difficult in the guest rooms. “We had to create a room in which the furniture pieces would meet the needs and expectations of the Western guest, but have the design aesthetic of Africa,” says Anita Brooks, principal with ABA. “One cannot simply go shopping in Africa to find the needed headboard, television armoire, light fixtures, and variety of shelf designs. In addition, all elements had to meet Florida’s stringent fire codes. So we used dozens of African headboards as the inspiration for the shape and designs of our headboards. The patterns in the custom fabrics used on the bedspreads and draperies are reinterpretations of traditional African patterns printed on durable fire-retardant fabrics.” Design elements offer as much to adults as children. Wall coverings represent a map of a section of Africa which reads as simply a romantic mural or a visual puzzle that subtley includes both animals and Disney icons in the backgrounds. While adults appreciate the romance of the looped mosquito netting above the bed or the continuity of the hand-carved wood elements and mud wall finishes, children are drawn to the bright African colors and the dash of Disney provided by opportunities to find the “Mickeys” in the guest room fabrics and corridor carpets. Throughout the hotel, there are explanations of both art and artifacts aimed at enriching the experience and enjoyment of an audience that ranges from the youngest children to seniors.

“A hotel is really a three-dimensional film set. Like a movie, it is about fantasy, imagination, and emotion,” says Chao. “Design means not only the architecture and the furnishings, but the graphics and costumes. Everything has to fit. The eyes of the guest see like the lens of a camera. The goal of the design is to make guests think that they are really in Africa.”

 

Print Friendly

Comments

  1. Bobby B. says:

    Two articles in one day referencing Ed Mazria? Who is he?

    I liked “Blade Runner”, but the cities were dark and depressing.

    Anyway, everyone wants us to change our household lighting to CFL’s regardless of whether or not the light that they provide is adequate for a given task. As I have posted before, I like halogens for doing exacting work because the light mimics sunlight the best and incandescents for reading because of their softness. CFL’s at my house are reserved for fixtures that see lots of general illumination use (bathrooms, security, etc.). No one seems to want to mention that nearly 100% of office buildings use fluorescents already, and we still have this CO2 scare. Also, no one seems to care about earlier studies regarding potential health hazard of fluorescent lighting:

    http://www.holisticmed.com/toxic/fluorescent.html

    I believe several such studies were done in the 70′s, but most of the health hazards were discounted due to energy savings. However, it is still interesting that the research ever happened. And even though the mercury content is “minimal”, 5 to 20 milligrams per bulb or tube becomes significant when you start talking about billions of fixtures.

    Regarding Hill’s comments on coal gasification, the technology does show some promise but I don’t see where you save on CO2 emissions. The equation (2C* + 2H2O => CH4 + CO2) from the GreenPoint Energy website shows the Step 1 CO2 release. The CH4 is yielded as usable methane (i.e. natural gas), and the CO2 goes where? I think the combustion equation for methane is CH4 + 2O2 (from air) => CO2 + 2H2O, which demonstrates the Step 2 CO2 release. Again, this CO2 goes where? There are also some nitrous oxides emitted since air is around 80% nitrogen, and some trace sulfur oxides. Don’t get me wrong, it is awesome that the gasification process lowers the SOx and NOx originating with the coal significantly, but since all that we are worried about is CO2 where is the benefit?

    Think about it.

  2. Bobby B. says:

    Two articles in one day referencing Ed Mazria? Who is he?

    I liked “Blade Runner”, but the cities were dark and depressing.

    Anyway, everyone wants us to change our household lighting to CFL’s regardless of whether or not the light that they provide is adequate for a given task. As I have posted before, I like halogens for doing exacting work because the light mimics sunlight the best and incandescents for reading because of their softness. CFL’s at my house are reserved for fixtures that see lots of general illumination use (bathrooms, security, etc.). No one seems to want to mention that nearly 100% of office buildings use fluorescents already, and we still have this CO2 scare. Also, no one seems to care about earlier studies regarding potential health hazard of fluorescent lighting:

    http://www.holisticmed.com/toxic/fluorescent.html

    I believe several such studies were done in the 70′s, but most of the health hazards were discounted due to energy savings. However, it is still interesting that the research ever happened. And even though the mercury content is “minimal”, 5 to 20 milligrams per bulb or tube becomes significant when you start talking about billions of fixtures.

    Regarding Hill’s comments on coal gasification, the technology does show some promise but I don’t see where you save on CO2 emissions. The equation (2C* + 2H2O => CH4 + CO2) from the GreenPoint Energy website shows the Step 1 CO2 release. The CH4 is yielded as usable methane (i.e. natural gas), and the CO2 goes where? I think the combustion equation for methane is CH4 + 2O2 (from air) => CO2 + 2H2O, which demonstrates the Step 2 CO2 release. Again, this CO2 goes where? There are also some nitrous oxides emitted since air is around 80% nitrogen, and some trace sulfur oxides. Don’t get me wrong, it is awesome that the gasification process lowers the SOx and NOx originating with the coal significantly, but since all that we are worried about is CO2 where is the benefit?

    Think about it.

  3. ANUPAM SIR says:

    Hi all
    The matter is very clear that one should require CO2 sinks, such as trees. instead of CO2 producer such as all fossil fuel including CNG for living healthy in coming years.
    thanks
    bye

  4. ANUPAM SIR says:

    Hi all
    The matter is very clear that one should require CO2 sinks, such as trees. instead of CO2 producer such as all fossil fuel including CNG for living healthy in coming years.
    thanks
    bye

Speak Your Mind

*